Quick Read of my year-long Inquiry about Raising Maori achievement in maths by making teaching, learning and feedback visible and by discussing data with learners
| |||||||||||||||||||
Making teaching, learning and feedback visible and sharing NCEA L1 data with learners to inform my teaching practice so that there is a shift in academic achievement of Maori Learners
| |||||||||||||||||||
50% of our Maori Learners achieved L1 Numeracy the previous year compared to our national decile equivalent of 68.7%. 2017 school target is 80%.
| |||||||||||||||||||
NCEA L1 Maori learners in 1104MAT
| |||||||||||||||||||
VTaL framework Google calendar Sharing data with learners Goal setting Literacy Strategies
Teaching and learning strategies Achievement objectives in “student speak” Positive conversations
Appreciation postcards Communicating with whanau about how WE can best support the learner TOGETHER
| |||||||||||||||||||
Communication with whanau about how best we could both support the learner for success.
Both teacher and whanau had great faith in their ability to achieve. Learner efficacy improved as the quality and quantity of work met the requirements for NCEA L1 Constant reinforcement of teacher belief in learner ability | |||||||||||||||||||
"Every time you called my mum whether it was something good or bad it motivated me to do better in maths. The calls my mum received also helped me work harder to ask the teacher for help instead of acting like i know what im doing"
| |||||||||||||||||||
The end is now upon us and so I face the final analysis comparing 2016 NCEA L1 Maori data with that of 2017.
My takeaway (using data of learners who completed the school year):
Maori learners exceeded the college’s target of 80% getting numeracy
There was a 13% increase in numeracy for the whole class (from 26% in 2016 to 39% in 2017) and for Maori learners, there was an 83% increase in numeracy (17% in 2016 to 100% in 2017)
What did we do differently?
Teaching and learning was more visible using ViTaL sheets and Google calendars and feedback was based on effort using NCEA achievement criteria
The use of standard-specific literacy strategies were more explicit and deliberate:
Chunking
Word definition
3 level guide
Mnemonics
Donut
Give one, Get one
Academic achievement data conversation (both across all curriculum levels and for mathematics, for the year level, were shared and discussed at regular intervals)
|
What happened for the learners
|
Each learner had access to a teaching and learning Template for each Achievement Standard
work at their own pace
choose their desired achievement level for each std
complete their learning programme by tracking their progress on a ViTaL sheet before sitting summative tasks
Conferencing was done at the learner’s request and feedback encouraged learning conversations about how to progress to the next level
Questions were answered with questions to promote independent thinking and proactive learners
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
What evidence do I have for this
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
What did I do to make this happen?
|
The use of standard-specific literacy strategies were more explicit and deliberate and understood and used by learners:
Chunking
Word definition
3 level guide
Mnemonics
Donut
Give one, Get one
Academic achievement data conversation (both across all curriculum levels and for mathematics, for the year level, were shared and discussed at regular intervals)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wonderings about what next
|
Students - Can students continue to self-manage next year with a different teacher?
Teacher - Strategies to engage more Maori whanau so that we can best support the learner together
|